The website is currently experiencing some downtime.
Stay tuned for more information.

to stay updated on our progress.

Monday, December 27, 2010

Week 17 NFL Predictions: January 2, 2011

Early picks for week 17.  More will be added during the week. 

Oakland Raiders vs Kansas City Chiefs: OAK +4
If this was any other week I would be taking KC without giving it a second thought.  At full strength, KC would control this game on the ground and do enough on defense to keep OAK at bay.  Arrowhead is not an easy place to play when their team is competitive.  However, with KC clinching the division in week 16, all they have to play for is the 3rd seed.  There are many analysts out there saying that KC need to win this game because they don't want to travel to NE if they happen to advance to the divisional round.  Also, Todd Haley came out today and said that he will be playing his starters with the intention on winning.  This all sounds good in theory, but I'm not buying it and I'm willing to wager on OAK to back it up.

I've heard this song and dance before from teams heading into week 17, but soon after the game all of them admit that resting some players and going into the playoffs healthy was more important.  I don't think KC care if they travel to NE or not because they are going to have the 'just happy to be there' syndrome.  The season is already a monumental success and if they win in wild card weekend the organization will be over the moon with delight.  Does that mean the starters won't play?  I think they will, but for how long?  A quarter?  Two?  I can't see them risking the health of the likes of Bowe, Charles, and Cassel in a game for the 3rd seed.

Meanwhile, OAK will come into this game dejected from missing the playoffs, but they have a chance to finish the season 8-8 which would be a great improvement for this organization too.  Yes McFadden and Seymour are banged up, but that won't stop them from doing what they've done well all season - run the ball and play good against the pass.  I expect both of these trends to continue on Sunday.  I also don't think the KC running game will have as much of an advantage due to the circumstances.  This isn't a game that KC will play all out even if they do leave their starters in longer than I expect.   If things go how I anticipate, four points is a late X-mas present.  Prediction: Bank OAK +4.

New York Giants vs Washington Redskins: NY -3.5
The line in this game has since moved to -4, but I have no problem taking them at this number either.  I really don't like what is going on in Washington, despite their performances over the last couple of weeks.  At the end of the day NY is the better football team and they have no choice but to play to win this game.  Their chances of making the playoffs are bleak and out of their control, but they need to give themselves that chance.  Yes they got spanked pretty mightily last week in GB, but Rex Grossman is not Aaron Rodgers.  Look for NY to do to him what they've done to most QB's this season - bang him around and cause havoc.  I know there are many of you that are saavy enough to know that NY appears to be doing their perennial nose dive to end the season, but they have too many mismatches in this game that I can't ignore.  They should be able to have their way on the ground and as long as Eli doesn't throw another four interceptions they will be alright in this one.

It's not like things are peachy creamy in the nation's capital either.  WSH continue to be as dysfunctional today as they were when Dan Snyder took over the team all those years ago.  The primary advantage they will hold in this game is on special teams.  Home field advantage will help, but it won't be the factor that it would be if they were in the playoff hunt.  Therefore they lose that extra point that other teams going to the big dance get for home field at this time of the year.  NY handled them pretty convincingly the last time they met, and I see little reason to think it won't happen again.  Prediction: Bank NYG-3.5.

Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers: GB -10
If the Philadelphia Eagles didn't lose to the Vikings on Tuesday night, this game would be an intense affair.  Yet, even if the Bears did have something to play for I would still be siding with the Packers.  When these teams first met on Monday Night Football earlier in the season, Green Bay committed 19 penalties.  Even with these monumental mistakes, they still had the ball and were driving down the field for the game winning field goal before a fumble that turned the tide.  Not many people in the nation are giving CHI the respect they want, but I'm not about to do that either.  Yes they have a very good cover 2 zone defense and the Cutler and Forte can make plays, but at the end of the day I find them far too inconsistent on offense to be a serious threat in the playoffs.   They have been average in red zone offense/defense all year and horrible on third down offense.  CHI also rank very low in completed plays per game.

So when you consider that this game only means something to one side, it's not hard to figure out why I like GB -10.  They need to win this game to secure a playoff spot and they are at home.  CHI won't be able to put up much of a fight for four quarters with backups at the critical positions.   Look for GB to cause havoc in the CHI backfield for much of the game and once CHI fall behind they won't be able to generate many points in the air.  Rodgers will be able to pick this zone defense apart and he himself could be resting in the 4th quarter if the game gets too out of hand.  Would CHI love to win this game and eliminate their division rivals?  Absolutely.  Will they do it at the expense of injury risk?  I highly doubt Lovie Smith is that stupid.  GB have five players going to the Pro Bowl and another four listed as alternates.  All of them will be in the lineup on Sunday in what should be a double-digit win.  Prediction: Bank GB -10.

St Louis Rams vs Seattle Seahawks: STL -1
This is another line that has moved since it opened at -1.  It currently sits at -3 which is not where I would like to take it.  I thought there was a lot of value with anything under 3, but I would still go with it at the end of the day.  At worst I see a push because I think this Rams team is headed for the playoffs for the first time in a long time.  After a rough couple of weeks, Sam Bradford really stepped it up last week completing 72% of his passes.  Yes it was the lowly 49ers, but it is still an impressive performance from a rookie QB in a must-win situation.  At the same time, I think it will be STL's defense that will step up to the plate in this one.  I don't see how SEA will be able to run the ball with much success and I really don't like what's going on in the passing game.  Matt Hasselbeck is more dangerous to himself than any defender has been this season.  The coaches decided to go with him after a four interception game which tells you everything you need to know about what they think of Charlie Whitehurst at this time.  Look for coach Spags to scheme up some nice pressure packages on Sunday night and it should be good for a couple of turnovers.   

On the other side I expect some ups and downs because this will be a new test for Bradford.  It will be a prime-time game with their season on the line in a very hostile environment.  Thankfully for him he has pro-bowler Steven Jackson behind him.  They should be balanced enough on offense to win the time of possession and keep the defense honest.  In fact, they hold the edge in all three critical categories that I look at on the field.  Even Mike Williams stated this week that it will be asking a lot of them to just turn it on after their recent play.  That's not exactly the most ringing endorsement of confidence that I have heard.  I never thought I would be looking forward to a game in the NFC West this season, but it is a testament to the new NFL that this game provides intrigue.  I'll be tuning in to see this "big" game with the full expectation of a Rams win.  Prediction: Bank STL -1.
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Subscribe via Email


Overall NHL Records

Overall: 1314-1239-38 (+325.39u)

ML: 536-540 (+146.57u)
Regulation: 376-338 (+112.46u)
Puckline: 41-54-1 (+2.22)

Player Props: 167-106-24 (+62.22u)
Team Props: 57-36 (+40.51u)
Totals: 121-124-13 (-20.67)
Parlays: 9-20 (-5.3u)
Grand Salamis: 3-9 (-13.12u)

Futures: 3-12 (+0.5u)

Records Archive

NHL 2017/2018

Overall: 78-94 (-12.81u)

54-66-0 (-10.31u)
24-26 (+1.5u)
0-2 (-4u)

Player Props: 0-0
Team Props:


NHL 2016/2017

Overall: 210-219-1 (+50.34u)

124-132 (+34.13u)
51-53 (+6.86u)
6-5 (+5.6)

Player Props: 9-6 (+4.2)
Team Props:
10-12 (-5.13)
8-8-1 (-0.3u)

1-3 (+5u)

NHL 2015/2016

Overall: 223-194-1 (+106.79u)

ML: 119-104 (+64.4)
Regulation: 75-69 (+27.84u)
Puckline: 0-5 (-10u)

Player Props: 16-7-1 (+14.75u)
Team Props: 13-6 (+15.8u)
Totals: 0-0
: 0-0
Grand Salamis: 0-0

Futures: 0-3 (-6u)

NHL 2014/2015

Overall: 331-357-10 (+11.25u)

ML: 95-105 (+4.66u)
Regulation: 100-94 (+17.76u)
Puckline: 31-38 (+8.02u)

Player Props: 48-39-7 (+8.65u)
Team Props: 17-10 (+13.77u)
Totals: 29-44-3 (-32.03u)
: 9-20 (-5.3u)
Grand Salamis: 1-3 (-4.28u)

Futures: 1-4 (0u)

NHL 2013/2014

Overall: 472-375-26 (+169.82u)

ML: 144-133 (+53.69u)
Regulation: 126-96 (+58.52u)
Puckline: 4-4-1 (+2.6u)

Player Props: 94-54-16 (+34.62u)
Team Props: 17-8 (+16.07u)
Totals: 84-72-9 (+11.66u)
Grand Salamis: 2-6 (-8.84u)

Futures: 1-2 (+1.5u)


Overall: 23-20 (+20.38u)

ML: 7-4 (+12.12u)
Regulation: 1-1 (+2u)
Puckline: 10-7 (+9.06u)

Totals: 4-0 (+7.2u)

Futures: 1-8 (-10u)


Overall ATS: 277-252-21

Playoffs ATS: 23-17-2
Regular Season ATS: 194-193-18
Preseason ATS: 59-41-1

Totals: 54-57-2
Teasers: 113-95-3
Props: 288-242